Mini Countryman 2017 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 42 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Countryman version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mini Countryman 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is larger. Mini Countryman is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1390 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Mini Countryman has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |