Mini Countryman 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 218 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 305 NM | 165 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 13.9 seconds | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.5 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
|
On average, the Mini Countryman petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan Qashqai. On average, Mini Countryman equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 - 150 mm (5.1 - 5.9 inches) | 180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller. Mini Countryman is 27 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Countryman is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1170 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 80 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 415 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`860 kg | ~ 1`924 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`340 kg | ~ 1`353 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 520 kg | ~ 571 kg | |
| Mini Countryman load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Qashqai scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |