Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mazda 323 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes SLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 323 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 71 - 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 108 - 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 11.8 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 6.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mercedes SLK is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 323 has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |