Mercedes E class 2013 vs Mercedes GLK 2012
Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Mercedes E class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes E class engine produces 61 HP more power than Mercedes GLK, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Mercedes GLK. Thanks to more power Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes E class consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes E class consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLK. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
1400 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes GLK engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes Vito | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes E klase 2013 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.88 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.70 m | |
Mercedes E class is larger, but lower. Mercedes E class is 35 cm longer than the Mercedes GLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 23 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 90 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLK. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLK, which means Mercedes E class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`420 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Mercedes GLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes GLK, so Mercedes GLK quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 16 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Mercedes GLK has
| |