Mercedes E class 2013 vs Mercedes GLK 2012
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes E class engine produces 61 HP more power than Mercedes GLK, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Mercedes GLK. Thanks to more power Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes E class consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes E class consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes GLK engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes Vito | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes E klase 2013 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mercedes E class is larger, but lower. Mercedes E class is 35 cm longer than the Mercedes GLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 90 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLK, which means Mercedes E class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mercedes GLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes GLK, so Mercedes GLK quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Mercedes GLK has
| |