Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 6 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is larger. Mazda Tribute is 3 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1470 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Tribute has 218 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mazda Tribute uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 775 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mazda Tribute can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |