Mazda Tribute 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda Tribute is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda Tribute also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Toyota RAV4 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 - 240 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 - 302 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 11.3 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Mazda Tribute petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 206 - 213 mm (8.1 - 8.4 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda Tribute can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1903 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Tribute has 303 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The Toyota RAV4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 433 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mazda Tribute can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |