Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Ford Kuga 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 98 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 5.8 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 224 mm (8.8 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-9 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 46 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2017 litres | 1481 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 536 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Mazda CX-9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`570 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`837 kg | 1`698 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 733 kg | 582 kg | |
| Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |