Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Ford Kuga 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 79 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 45 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 46 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 1481 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 536 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Mazda CX-9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`570 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |