Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Ford Ranger 2006

 
Mazda CX-9
2009 - 2012
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.7 Petrol2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 273 HP143 HP
Torque: 367 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12 seconds
Mazda CX-9 engine produces 130 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Ford Ranger.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.98.9
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-9 consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 600 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway800 km on highway
Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 203 mm (8 inches)205 mm (8.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.09 m5.08 m
Width: 1.94 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.76 m
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda CX-9 is 1 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 3 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 487 litres1500 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 487 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data1500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2852 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0623`020
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10 2007400
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
Ford Ranger has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv