Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-9) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 120 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 and Ford Ranger are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`635 | 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |