Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Ford Kuga 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Kuga has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.8 | 1.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 46 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 1534 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 483 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Mazda CX-9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`605 | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |