Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Ford Kuga 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Kuga has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Kuga are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-9. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.8 | 1.2 - 6.9 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 224 mm (8.8 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 46 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2017 litres | 1534 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 483 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Mazda CX-9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`605 kg | ~ 2`168 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`903 kg | ~ 1`592 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 702 kg | ~ 576 kg | |
| Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |