Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Despite less power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`210 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |