Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 43 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 73 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`987 kg | 1`890 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |