Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 24 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
| Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 17 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 76 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |