Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 2017 engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, but torque is 14 NM less than Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 56 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-5 2012 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 2017 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2017 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2017, so Mazda CX-5 2017 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |