Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mazda CX-30) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Qashqai) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 42 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1447 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`949 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |