Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Ford Kuga 2019

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Ford Kuga
2019 - 2021
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP150 HP
Torque: 270 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds9.6 seconds
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 34 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.7
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1310 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 175 mm (6.9 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.61 m
Width: 1.80 m1.88 m
Height: 1.56 m1.68 m
Mazda CX-30 is smaller.
Mazda CX-30 is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1406 litres1534 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight: 1`949 kg2`155 kg
Net weight:1`344 kg1`605 kg
Load capacity:605 kg550 kg
Mazda CX-30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 20017 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv