Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mazda CX-30) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Qashqai) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 24 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1447 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 49 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |