Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 42 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1447 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |