Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Ford Kuga 2020

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Ford Kuga
2020 - 2024
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 186 HP152 HP
Torque: 240 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds9.5 seconds
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 34 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.8
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres45 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 180 mm (7.1 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.61 m
Width: 1.80 m1.88 m
Height: 1.56 m1.68 m
Mazda CX-30 is smaller.
Mazda CX-30 is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres405 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1406 litres1481 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 75 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight: 1`965 kg2`280 kg
Net weight:1`454 kg1`698 kg
Load capacity:511 kg582 kg
Mazda CX-30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Ford Kuga is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 20017 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Ford Kuga has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv