Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Ford Kuga 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 13 NM more than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1406 litres | 1481 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`957 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`347 kg | 1`698 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 582 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |