Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 22 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 46 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.5 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used also on Nissan X-Trail | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1447 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
| |