Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Ford Kuga 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.8 | |
| Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1406 litres | 1481 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`471 kg | 1`698 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 599 kg | 582 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |