Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 140 - 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 240 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 9.2 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 5.5 - 6.2 | |
|
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1447 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 49 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 1`974 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |