Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Ford Kuga 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 1.2 | |
Ground clearance: | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 435 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1534 litres | |
Mazda CX-30 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 128 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 2`168 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 21 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |