Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Kamiq, but torque is 43 NM less than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kamiq, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`808 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |