Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019

 
Mazda CX-3
2018 -
Skoda Kamiq
2019 - 2023
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 207 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda CX-3 and Skoda Kamiq have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-3 torque is 43 NM less than Skoda Kamiq.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.75.1
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-3 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 240 litres more fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip.

Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)182 mm (7.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kamiq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Kamiq version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine 

Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ...  More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.24 m
Width: 1.77 m1.79 m
Height: 1.54 m1.53 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kamiq, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1260 litres1395 litres
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 135 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kamiq.
Gross weight: 1`808 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 14 40019 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Skoda Kamiq has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv