Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-3 torque is 43 NM less than Seat Ateca. Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 50 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ateca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 160 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`808 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |