Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mini Countryman 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 28 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Countryman version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Mini Countryman 2020 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Mini Countryman, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1260 litres | 1390 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`808 kg | 2`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`340 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 468 kg | 560 kg | |
| Mazda CX-3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Mini Countryman. Therefore, Mini Countryman is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |