Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mini Countryman 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 14 HP more power than Mini Countryman, but torque is 13 NM less than Mini Countryman. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.5 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Countryman version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mini Countryman 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Mini Countryman, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1390 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`808 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |