Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Audi Q3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
| Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi Q3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1365 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`808 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-3 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |