Mazda CX-3 2015 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 21 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 8 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite less power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Qashqai is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |