Mazda CX-3 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 204 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.3 | |
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.67 m | |
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 463 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1620 litres | |
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 113 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 360 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 250 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 000 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |