Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 150 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 - 270 NM | 165 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 11.9 seconds | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.4 | 4.0 - 7.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Mazda CX-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1260 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 325 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`814 kg | ~ 1`924 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`272 kg | ~ 1`353 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 542 kg | ~ 571 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Qashqai is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |