Mazda BT-50
2006 - 2008
Mazda BT-50 2.5 TD | 143 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Double Cab 2.5 TDCi RWD | 143 HP | Diesel | Manual
Double Cab 2.5 TDi | 143 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD | 143 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
4.0 V6 Automatic | 207 HP | Petrol | Automatic
4.0 V6 Automatic 4x4 | 207 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
3.0 TDCi Automatic | 156 HP | Diesel | Automatic
3.0 TDCi Automatic 4x4 | 156 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
2.3 Automatic | 143 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.3 Automatic 4x4 | 143 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
2.3 4x4 | 143 HP | Petrol | Manual | 4x4
2.3 | 143 HP | Petrol | Manual
Gearbox:
Manual Manual
Engine:
2.5 Diesel 2.5 Diesel
Performance
Power:
143 HP 143 HP
Torque:
330 NM 330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:
12.5 seconds 12 seconds
Mazda BT-50 and Ford Ranger have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda BT-50 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
8.9 8.9
Fuel tank capacity:
70 litres 63 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
780 km in combined cycle 700 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway 800 km on highway
Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption " to learn more about fuel economy.
Drive type
Wheel drive type:
All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance:
207 mm (8.1 inches) 205 mm (8.1 inches)
Dimensions
Length:
5.08 m 5.08 m
Width:
1.81 m 1.81 m
Height:
1.76 m 1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda BT-50 and Ford Ranger are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:
no data 1500 litres
Turning diameter:
12.5 meters 13 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):
3`030 3`020
Safety:
no data
Quality:
no data no data
Average price (€):
no data 7200
Pros and Cons:
Mazda BT-50 has
more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
