Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Isuzu D-Max has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.7 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.3 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 235 mm (9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Isuzu D-Max can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is smaller. Mazda BT-50 is 22 cm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`030 | ~ 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |