Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Ranger has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (diesel) | 2.3 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 143 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 209 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.9 - 10.4 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 203 - 205 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`030 | ~ 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |