Mazda 323 1998 vs Nissan Almera 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
| Mazda 323 engine produces 4 HP less power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Nissan Almera. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.1 | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 323 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 340 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 323 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |