Mazda 323 1998 vs Nissan Almera 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 28 HP less power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Nissan Almera. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 323 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 340 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 323 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |