Mazda 323 1998 vs Opel Astra 1998

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2000
Opel Astra
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 88 HP90 HP
Torque: 132 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 seconds15 seconds
Mazda 323 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 323 engine produces 2 HP less power than Opel Astra, but torque is 7 NM more than Opel Astra. Despite less power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.9
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 323 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway830 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 323 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda DemioUsed also on Opel Corsa
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 323 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.11 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 323 is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1180 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Mazda 323 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`630
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 323 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Astra, so Mazda 323 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv