Mazda 323 1998 vs Mazda MX-3 1991

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2000
Mazda MX-3
1991 - 1994
Body: HatchbackCoupe
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 88 HP90 HP
Torque: 132 NM135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 seconds10.5 seconds
Mazda MX-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 2 HP less power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Mazda MX-3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Mazda MX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway860 km on highway
630 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda DemioUsed also on Mazda 323
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 323 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.22 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.31 m
Mazda 323 is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres289 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 323 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. The Mazda MX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`475
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mazda MX-3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv