Mazda 323 1998 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Alfa Romeo 145
1999 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 88 HP155 HP
Torque: 132 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds8.3 seconds
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 67 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Alfa Romeo 145. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.58.7
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 323 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway920 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km290'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 323 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years3 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda DemioInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo Spider
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.06 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.40 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 323 is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1130 litres
Mazda 323 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 145, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5851`765
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 145 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv