Mazda 323 1998 vs Mazda MX-3 1994

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2000
Mazda MX-3
1994 - 1998
Body: HatchbackCoupe
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP110 HP
Torque: 108 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds10.5 seconds
Mazda MX-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Mazda MX-3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km8.1 l/100km
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 75 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 323 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway830 km on highway
640 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 18 years16 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Xedos 6
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda MX-3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ...  More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.22 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.31 m
Mazda 323 is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres135 litres
Mazda 323 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 323 has 169 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. The Mazda MX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5101`430
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda MX-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv