Mazda 323 1998 vs Mazda 3 2007

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Mazda 3
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 72 HP143 HP
Torque: 128 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.9 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 71 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 232 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.0
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 323 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1010 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.42 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Mazda 323 is smaller.
Mazda 323 is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litres635 litres
Mazda 323 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 323 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 323 (by 365 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`945
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 323 has serious deffects in 845 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 6001800
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv