Mazda 323 1998 vs Mazda 323 1998

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Mazda 323
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 114 HP88 HP
Torque: 161 NM132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds14.2 seconds
Mazda 323 1998 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 323 1998 engine produces 26 HP more power than Mazda 323 1998, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Mazda 323 1998. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Mazda 323 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 323 1998 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 1998 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 1998 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323 1998.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway820 km on highway
560 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Mazda 323 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 323 1998 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda PremacyUsed also on Mazda Demio
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mazda 323 1998 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.04 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Mazda 323 1998 is 16 cm longer than the Mazda 323 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 1998 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres304 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litresno data
Mazda 323 1998 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 323 1998 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323 1998.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 1998 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 323 1998, which means Mazda 323 1998 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv