Mazda 323 1998 vs Nissan Almera 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Nissan Almera
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 71 - 88 HP75 - 99 HP
Torque: 108 - 132 NM116 - 136 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 - 16.8 seconds11 - 16.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 8.46.1 - 8.2
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, Mazda 323 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.14 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Mazda 323 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres340 litres
Nissan Almera has more luggage space.
Mazda 323 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`595~ 1`591
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 9.0/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Nissan Almera has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv