Mazda 323 1998 vs Mazda Premacy 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Mazda Premacy
1999 - 2001
Body: HatchbackMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.01.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 71 - 88 HP90 - 115 HP
Torque: 108 - 132 NM152 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 - 16.8 seconds11.4 - 12.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 8.45.7 - 9.2
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Premacy. On average, Mazda 323 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.30 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.57 m
Mazda 323 is 26 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 17 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres420 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1848 litres
Mazda Premacy has more luggage space.
Mazda 323 has 116 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Premacy.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`595~ 1`784
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda Premacy has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv