Mazda 323 1998 vs Nissan Micra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 88 HP | 57 - 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 132 NM | 80 - 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 - 16.8 seconds | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.4 | 5.2 - 6.4 | |
|
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. On average, Mazda 323 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 323 is 29 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 960 litres | |
|
Mazda 323 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 323 has 98 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`595 | ~ 1`358 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |