Mazda 3 2006 vs Honda Insight 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 3 engine produces 7 HP more power than Honda Insight. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Insight is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Insight, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Insight. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 3 cm longer than the Honda Insight, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
635 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`725 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Insight has
| |