Mazda 3 2006 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | n/a NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 45 HP less power than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.5 | |
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 8 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
635 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |